Minimally Invasive Hip Replacement Surgery

American association of hip and knee surgeons minimally invasive and small incision joint replacement surgery.

Minimally invasive hip replacement surgery.

1 6 this area of ongoing research is an example of how the medical field is continually evolving and trying to improve outcomes for patients. A primary difference between minimally invasive hip replacement surgery and traditional hip replacement surgery is the amount of skin muscle and other soft tissues that must be cut. In the meantime people considering hip replacement surgery and their surgeons must make decisions. The hope is that minimally invasive techniques will allow for an easier recovery in the short term and provide equal or better results in the long term.

Research on minimally invasive hip replacement surgery is mixed and it is not clear whether it has an advantage over traditional hip replacement surgery. It also uses special tools. Beneath the incision the muscle is separated and the hip joint is exposed. Minimally invasive and small incision total hip replacement surgery is an evolving area and more research is needed on the long term function and durability of the implants.

The benefits of minimally invasive hip replacement have been reported to include less damage to soft tissues leading to a quicker less painful recovery and more rapid. Minimally invasive hip replacement surgery is a general term that describes several variations of existing surgeries. Less trauma to the tissues results in less postoperative discomfort and. What surgeons should consider park ridge ill 2004.

Traditional hip replacement surgery is done through an incision that is usually about 5 to 8 inches in length. In the hip joint the rounded head of the thigh bone the femoral head moves smoothly inside the round socket of the hip bone. A minimally invasive total hip replacement uses a smaller cut incision than a traditional total hip replacement.